eDiscovery Daily Blog
Deadline Extended to Vote for the Most Significant eDiscovery Case of 2010
Our ‘little experiment’ to see what the readers of eDiscoveryDaily think about case law developments in 2010 needs more time as we have not yet received enough votes yet to have a statistically significant result. So, we’ve extended the deadline to select the case with the most significant impact on eDiscovery practices in 2010 to February 28. Evidently, calling out the vote on the last business day before LegalTech is not the best timing. Live and learn!
As noted previously, we have “nominated” five cases, which we feel were the most significant in different issues of case law, including duty to preserve and sanctions, clawback agreements under Federal Rule of Evidence 502, not reasonably accessible arguments and discoverability of social media content. If you feel that some other case was the most significant case of 2010, you can select that case instead. Again, it’s very important to note that you can vote anonymously, so we’re not using this as a “hook” to get your information. You can select your case without providing any personal information. However, we would welcome your comments as to why you selected the case you did and you can – optionally – identify yourself as well.
To get more information about the nominated cases (as well as other significant cases), click here. To cast your vote, click here.
And, as always, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.