eDiscovery Daily Blog
Need to Make Key Discovery Decisions? Build a Tree – eDiscovery Best Practices
There are several decisions that the lead attorney has to make when a new case is filed. Decisions made early in the life cycle of a case can significantly affect how discovery is managed and how costly the discovery process can be for that case. Decision trees are a mechanism that can help attorneys plan for discovery by enabling them to make decisions up front that can lead to more efficient management of the discovery process.
What is a Decision Tree?
A decision tree is a decision support tool that uses a tree-like graph or model of decisions and their possible consequences. It is essentially a flowchart in which each internal node represents a test on an attribute, each branch represents outcome of that test and each leaf node represents the decision taken after computing all attributes.
Have you ever prepared an analysis at the outset of a case to estimate the probability of winning the case and determining whether to litigate or attempt to settle? Then, you’ve probably prepared some sort of decision tree to make those decisions. You probably looked at the probability of winning, probabilities of different award amounts, extrapolated the costs for litigating against the potential award amounts and used that to decide how to proceed. Today’s graphic provides an example of what a decision tree, drawn as a flowchart, might look like to represent that process.
Uses of Decision Trees in Discovery
Decision trees identify the available alternatives to tackle a particular business problem and can help identify the conditions conducive to each alternative. Issues in discovery for which a decision tree might be warranted could include:
- Decide whether to outsource litigation support and discovery activities or keep them in-house;
- Select an appropriate discovery solution to meet your organization’s needs within its budget;
- Decide when to implement a litigation hold and determine how to comply with your organization’s ongoing duty to preserve data;
- Determine how to manage collection procedures in discovery that identify the appropriate custodians for each type of case;
- Decide whether to perform responsiveness and privilege review of native files or convert to an image format such as TIFF or PDF to support those review processes,
- Determine whether to agree to produce native files or converted TIFF or PDF images to opposing counsel.
In addition to promoting efficiency in the discovery process by planning up front, decision trees can also promote consistency in handling cases. Decision trees are a great tool for walking through the logic of the decision making process, which reduces mistakes in the process by making the process more predictable and repeatable.
So, what do you think? Does your organization use decision trees in your discovery process? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Graphic source: Wikipedia.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine Discovery. eDiscoveryDaily is made available by CloudNine Discovery solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscoveryDaily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.
CloudNine empowers legal, information technology, and business professionals with eDiscovery automation software and professional services that simplify litigation, investigations, and audits for law firms and corporations.