Software
Solutions Overview
SAAS
CloudNine Review
CloudNine Analyst
On Premise
CloudNine Concordance
CloudNine Explore
Cloudnine LAW
Reviews & Testimonials
Use Cases
Use Cases Overview
Litigation
Investigations
FOIA/Public Records Request
Audits
Services
Professional Services Overview
Collection Services
Discovery Services
Review Services
Additional Services
Education
Blog
Case Studies
Did You Know
Webcasts & Podcasts
Training
Answer Center
Company
About
Team
News
Careers
Partnerships
Events
Security
Contact
General inquiries
Support
713-462-6464
Request a Demo
Login
CloudNine
713-462-6464
Request a Demo
Login
0
Software
Solutions Overview
SAAS
CloudNine Review
CloudNine Analyst
On Premise
CloudNine Concordance
CloudNine Explore
Cloudnine LAW
Reviews & Testimonials
Use Cases
Use Cases Overview
Litigation
Investigations
FOIA/Public Records Request
Audits
Services
Professional Services Overview
Collection Services
Discovery Services
Review Services
Additional Services
Education
Blog
Case Studies
Did You Know
Webcasts & Podcasts
Training
Answer Center
Company
About
Team
News
Careers
Partnerships
Events
Security
Contact
General inquiries
Support
Close
Enter your
text here
eDiscovery Daily Blog
Home
»
eDiscoveryDaily
»
Electronic Discovery
»
Court Rules Defendant’s Production Need Not Be Lost in Translation: eDiscovery Case Law
»
NY Machinery v. The Korean Cleaners Monthly_2020-01-27 00_06_41 +0000
NY Machinery v. The Korean Cleaners Monthly_2020-01-27 00_06_41 +0000
January 26, 2020
X