Close
Enter your
text here

Industry Trends

The Cowen Group 2016 eDiscovery and Litigation Support Salary Report: eDiscovery Trends

A couple of weeks ago, we covered the Robert Half 2017 Legal Salary Guide with a specific focus on litigation support and eDiscovery salaries.  This week, we’re covering results from the Tenth Annual Salary Survey from The Cowen Group.  Let’s take a look at this latest opportunity to push for that raise you’ve been wanting.

This year, there were 244 responses received from law firms (36% Large Law respondents, 22% Mid-Law), service providers (19%), corporations (19%) and government (4%), with over 50 organizations providing compensation information for their eDiscovery teams to bolster and corroborate data received from individual survey respondents.  Here are a few other noteworthy findings from the 15 page report.

  • New Positions: The Cowen Group predicted that approximately 245 new positions will be created in 2017, with the strongest growth and demand taking place in the vendor/service provider sector with particular emphasis being placed on technical professionals (60 new hires) and project managers (86), as well as growth positions such as data scientists (6), forensic professionals (20) and customer/client success experts (7).
  • Median Salaries Largely Flat: As was the case in the past two annual reports, median salaries remained relatively flat, with only a 0-2% median increase over last year’s numbers. The Cowen Group attributed the flattening of median salaries to several factors, including increased reporting from mid-law firms, growing hiring trends for eDiscovery positions in both mid-sized organizations and middle-market geographic locations, and differentiation in base salaries between law firm, corporate, and vendor market segments. One notable exception with regard to flat salaries was the eDiscovery attorney group, who reported a 16% median increase over base salaries from the previous year.
  • Bonuses Up: As compared to base salaries, annual bonuses appear to be increasing steadily across the board and average bonuses amounted to higher percentages of base salaries this year, especially for Manager (approximately $10,080 as compared to $7,660 in last year’s report), Director, (approximately $16,100 as compared to $9,890) and Attorney roles (approximately $29,830 as compared to $12,809).
  • eDiscovery Professionals are Certifiable: The Certified eDiscovery Specialists (“CEDS”) remained the most commonly held certifications across all titles and roles. The Relativity Certified Administrator (“RCA”) and LexisNexis LAW Prediscovery (“LAW”) were the most widely held technical certification across several positions as well, with RCA providing a slightly positive influence on salary in the analyst and project manager roles.

The report also provides the minimum and maximum reported salary for each primary position for this year, as well as the mean, median, low (25%) and high (75%).  Median salaries were charted for each position from 2008 through 2016.  It also reports on geographical and organizational trends and provides a data sheet for each of the five primary positions, with skills for success and top certifications.

This 15 page guide is also FREE and is available here.  Check it out.  Maybe you need a raise?

So, what do you think?  Do the numbers surprise you?  Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

This is a Non-Political Post: eDiscovery Trends

At the outset, I feel that I should state that, given that this post is about the Hilary Clinton emails and the FBI handling of them.

In his latest post (E-Discovery Lessons from the Huma Abedin E-Mails), Craig Ball takes a look at the eDiscovery implications regarding the handling of the Huma Abedin emails and his distaste for FBI Director James Comey’s handling of them.  Craig states: “‘Reckless’ doesn’t begin to describe Comey’s self-indulgent decision to release information about a situation he clearly does not yet grasp, in a manner that elevates Jim Comey above longstanding Justice Department policy and the integrity of a Presidential election.”

Nonetheless, regardless of political leanings, Craig notes that his post “will not be a political screed, so while I always welcome critical and substantive comments on anything I write, please hew to the e-discovery aspects of same.  Please.”  Of course, at least one commenter (so far) still questioned the political intent of his post, characterizing Craig’s comments as “partisan”.  Not surprisingly, there were already 20 total comments on Craig’s post in less than a full day (including mine).

Craig’s post, and the comments back and forth are well worth reading.  One of the eDiscovery discussion points related to the cross-collection correlation of email messages – which Craig wrote about here and we covered here, with back and forth discussion between Craig and our CTO, Bill David – and the challenge of doing that when the Clinton emails were produced to the State Department in paper (yes, paper) format.  There was also a discussion as to whether the Clinton claim that “more than 90% of those emails should have already been captured in the State Department’s email system” was true and could have eliminated most of the email matching effort to determine whether there is significant new information in the Abedin emails that bear investigating.

And, to think this latest round was initiated because of our social media gone wrong poster child, Anthony Weiner.  Some people never learn to think before they hit send.

Bill Dimm provided a link to Hilary Clinton’s fact sheet regarding the emails in one of his comments, which answered the question as to why Clinton produced printed copies to the State Department instead of ESI, noting that the Foreign Affairs Manual of the State Department provides this guidance with regard to how to preserve e-mail records:

“Until technology allowing archival capabilities for long-term electronic storage and retrieval of E-mail messages is available and installed, those messages warranting preservation as records (for periods longer than current E-mail systems routinely maintain them) must be printed out and filed with related records.”  [5 FAM 443.3].

So, our government is just as behind as the rest of the legal profession (if not more) with regard to production formats.  Big surprise.

We’ve already discussed one area where eDiscovery might impact the coming election.  Maybe this is another.

So, what do you think?  Are you sick of hearing about the election yet?  Me too!  Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Don’t Be Afraid, It’s Only – eDiscovery Horrors!

Today is Halloween!  For the seventh year on this blog, it’s time to try to “scare” you with tales of eDiscovery (and now, cybersecurity) horrors (because, after all, we’re an eDiscovery blog).  Let’s see how we do this year.  Are you afraid?

Just when you thought you knew everything about Shakespeare, it turns out he may have had a co-writer.  You can thank big data analytics for that bit of knowledge.

What about this?

Speaking of Shakespeare, you won’t be able to retrieve one of his most famous phrases in most eDiscovery databases.  Here’s why.

Or this?

This plaintiff was sanctioned in July 2015 for failing to preserve text messages for four key custodians, but the sanction was vacated in January of this year.  What changed?

How about this?

Apparently, it appears that the parties (one of whom may someday be an appellant) appreciated the thought that appending a wildcard after “app” would be an appropriate application of the wildcard in that approach (but doing so might retrieve as many as 300 non-responsive search terms).

Or maybe this?

The most famous judge advocating the use of technology assisted review (TAR) has refused to order the defendant to use TAR in this case.  What the hell is going on out here?

Have you considered this?

This defendant received “punitive sanctions in the amount of $3,000,000” for the “intentional and admitted deletion of emails” by the defendant’s Senior Vice President of Sales.  Ouch!

Finally, how about this?

Imagine having 2.6 terabytes of data (comprised of 11.5 million documents) stolen from right under your nose, exposing possible illicit offshore holdings of global political leaders and celebrities with which your firm was involved.  If you’re at that firm, it makes you want to jump in the nearest canal!

Scary, huh?  If the possibility of multi-million dollar sanctions, humongous data breaches or reviewing a lot of non-responsive documents because of bad searches scares you, then the folks at eDiscovery Daily will do our best to provide useful information and best practices to enable you to relax and sleep soundly, even on Halloween!

Of course, if you seriously want to get into the spirit of Halloween, click here.  This will really terrify you!

What do you think?  Is there a particular eDiscovery issue that scares you?  Please share your comments and let us know if you’d like more information on a particular topic.

Happy Halloween!

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Florida Judges Say State Needs More eDiscovery Mediators: eDiscovery Trends

You’d think I lived in Florida as much as we’ve covered it lately, both good and not so good.  This story, for the first state to require technology CLE for attorneys, could be true in many other states as well.

In the Daily Business Review article Judges Zero In on E-Discovery as Promising Niche for Neutrals, written by Samantha Joseph (subscription required, but it’s free), a panel of state judges said there’s a big untapped opportunity for neutrals to specialize in electronic discovery.

Over 3,300 certified circuit court mediators practice in Florida, according to data from the state Supreme Court. But few specialize in eDiscovery, which was the focus of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure last year as courts mapped out litigants’ obligations to preserve electronically stored information (ESI).

“This would be a very good area for our mediators to become educated on,” said Palm Beach Circuit Judge Lisa Small.

Small joined Magistrate Judge Sarah Willis and Circuit Judges Meenu Sasser, Daliah Weiss and Jessica Ticktin (all with the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida) for a panel discussion Friday, moderated by David Steinfeld, Palm Beach Gardens attorney and founder of Everything e-Discovery LLC.

“Every single case is an e-discovery case now,” Sasser said. “That’s how we live our lives. Everyone is communicating through Facebook, emails, texts.”

Sasser, a finalist for a vacancy in the Fourth District Court of Appeal and the first sitting state court judge in Florida to implement a standing order on ESI, created a meet-and-confer obligation among litigants “to discuss in detail” their clients’ computer systems, software and other factors that could impact eDiscovery, delay cases and add thousands to court costs.  Sasser said administrative judges across the state contacted her to discuss the order, with plans to implement similar policies.

The judges on the panel all agreed on the idea of appointing a special magistrate to handle detailed, complex and time-consuming ESI issues, much like at the height of the housing crisis when some magistrates focused solely on foreclosures to help clear crowded dockets.  The judges said skilled neutrals would help them manage uniform calendar work – about 80-90 percent of which include discovery disputes, primarily involving electronic files and would potentially save litigants in complex litigation thousands of dollars.

So, if you’re a certified court mediator in Florida looking for an opportunity for more work, eDiscovery education could be the ticket.  Now you know on what you can spend (at least) those three required hours of technology CLE!

So, what do you think?  Does your state need more experienced eDiscovery mediators?  Maybe you could change your history!  Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

What Can Big Data Analytics Do? Rewrite History: eDiscovery Trends

One amusing plotline in the 1998 movie Shakespeare in Love (a terrific movie even though, IMHO, it shouldn’t have beaten out Saving Private Ryan for best picture that year – just sayin’) was the rivalry between young Will Shakespeare and fellow playwright Christopher Marlowe.  Shakespeare has become world renowned for centuries, while Marlowe has become largely forgotten (at least by the general public).  But now, Marlowe is being credited as a co-author in all three “Henry VI” plays (Parts 1, 2 and 3).  Says who?  Big Data Analytics.

In the Washington Post article Big debate about Shakespeare finally settled by big data: Marlowe gets his due by Travis M. Andrews, the author reports that, for the first time and with a bit of help from computers and big data, the Oxford University Press will add Marlowe as a co-author in all three “Henry VI” plays.

Though the two were rivals, scholars have long thought Shakespeare might have collaborated with Marlowe, among other contemporary writers as playwriting back then was “structured much the way scriptwriting is today — an author received an advance to write an outline, then the theater that owned the outline would hire different writers to fill in different parts, depending on what they wrote well.”

To find out if collaboration occurred, 23 international scholars performed text analysis by scanning through Marlowe’s (and other contemporary writers’) works, creating computerized data sets of the words and phrases he would repeat, along with how he did so — all of the idiosyncrasies that comprise one’s writing. Once they had a solid sample set of unique patterns, the New York Times reported, they cross-referenced it with Shakespeare’s plays.

The result? Seventeen of 44 of Shakespeare’s works probably had some sort of input from others. The three “Henry VI” plays proved to have enough of Marlowe’s literary footprint that his name deserved to be added as a co-author, Gary Taylor, a professor at Florida State University and one of the editors who led the research contended.

“We have been able to verify Marlowe’s presence in those three plays strongly and clearly enough,” Taylor told the Guardian. “We can now be confident that they didn’t just influence each other, but they worked with each other. Rivals sometimes collaborate.”

Of course, not everybody agreed with that assessment – one scholar suggested Shakespeare might have worked with the actors who were close to Marlowe and picked up his tendencies that way.

Regardless, it is certainly one interesting example of what big data analytics can do.  If only Marlowe’s attorney had that information a few centuries ago – he could have had a heck of an IP infringement case!  :o)

So, what do you think?  Do you see possibilities for big data analytics in your organization?  Maybe you could change your history!  Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

A New Partnership to Span Data and Legal Discovery: eDiscovery Trends

 

We usually preface any mention of our parent company CloudNine with a “shameless plug warning” note.  So, consider yourself warned.  However, our latest announcement – an exciting new partnership – bears mention here in this blog.  Oh, and there’s a webinar you should check out too.  :o)

Today, CloudNine is announcing a partnership with Heureka Software, a preeminent provider of technology that gathers and analyzes unstructured data. Our partnership will provide legal, business, and information technology professionals an integrated solution that combines data discovery and legal discovery to harvest data insight to provide actionable legal intelligence.

Remember last week when we discussed a framework for discovery automation that includes data discovery and legal discovery?  Our partnership with Heureka embraces that framework.

Our partnership provides users with Simplified Discovery Automation that gives information, business, and legal professionals an integrated solution that automates eight core tasks that help organizations translate data discovery into insight, and insight into legal intelligence.  Combined, the Heureka Intelligence Platform and the CloudNine eDiscovery Platform provide customers with a complete capability to discover data from the point of creation to defensible disposition.

Here is a link to our press release with more information.

Also, Heureka Founder & Chairman of the Board Ron Copfer and I will be presenting an ACEDS webinar titled Simplified eDiscovery Automation: From Evolution to Revolution next Thursday, November 3rd at 1pm ET.

Our webinar presentation will provide an overview of the evolution of electronic discovery technologies and share ways that you can consider and compare technology offerings from the large ecosystem of providers supporting litigation, investigations, and audits. It will also include an overview of the attributes of fourth generation eDiscovery automation technology as well as a short demonstration of two of those offerings: the Heureka and CloudNine platforms (and we’ll show you how to get a free trial during the presentation!).

Hope to see you there! (Recorded Version Available for On Demand Review)

So, what do you think?  Do you think of discovery as just related to litigation?  Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

A Half Salary Guide is a Whole Salary Guide: eDiscovery Trends

When it’s from Robert Half.

Robert Half’s 2017 Legal Salary Guide (downloadable from here) once again features salary ranges for more than 100 positions in the legal field and provides some other interesting statistics, as well. Here are a few highlights.

  • Incentive for Retention: In a survey of 200 lawyers among the largest law firms and corporations in the US, when asked which of the following provides the best incentive for legal professionals to remain with a law firm or company (aside from compensation or bonus), 34 percent of respondents said “Challenging work or variety of assignments”, 26 percent said “Flexible work arrangements” and 20 percent said “Professional development opportunities”. “Good corporate culture/work atmosphere” was a distant fourth at 6 percent.
  • Practice Areas with Greatest Job Opportunities: When asked which of the following practice areas will offer the greatest number of job opportunities at your law firm or company in the next two years, 36 percent of the same respondent group said Litigation, followed by General business/commercial law at 25 percent. No other group had more than 8 percent. Interestingly enough, the same question posed to 150 lawyers among the largest law firms and companies in Canada resulted in a flip-flop of those two practice areas with 36 percent choosing General business/corporate law and 31 percent choosing Litigation. Maybe it’s because Americans are more litigious?
  • Litigation Support/eDiscovery Salaries: Starting salaries for litigation support/eDiscovery directors and managers are expected to increase from 7.8 to 8.9 percent annually from 2016! The top end of the salary range for litigation support/eDiscovery directors with 10+ years of experience is $141,500. Document coders also see an increase – 4.6 percent over 2016.

The guide also provides salary expectations for lawyers, paralegals, office managers, legal secretaries, legal specialists and contract and compliance administration positions for both law firms and corporate legal. Once again, they’re all up (big surprise!).

The survey guide also provides an adjustment for various US cities across the country (obviously, salaries are much higher in New York City (140.5 percent of the reported numbers for the different positions) than in El Paso, TX (72 percent). For example, the top end of the salary range for litigation support/eDiscovery directors with 10+ years of experience in Houston (107 percent for my hometown) is actually $151,405 (are you reading this, boss?). So, you can adjust the numbers based on local variances.

So, what do you think? Do the numbers surprise you? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Once again, it’s a FREE 36 page PDF guide which can be downloaded here. Check it out. Maybe you need a raise?

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

A Framework for Discovery Automation: eDiscovery Trends

Automation has been a recurring theme this year on this blog. At the beginning of the year, I declared that the age of eDiscovery automation is upon us. I’ve also spoken about discovery automation on numerous occasions, including here, here, here, here and here (just two days ago!). Now, a recent post on the Complex Discovery blog takes an interesting look at a framework for discovery automation.

The post A Concise Framework for Discovery Automation notes that “[o]ne of the biggest challenges facing information, business, and legal professionals is the ability to cohesively consider the elements of data discovery and legal discovery within a technology framework that is comprehensive enough to address critical discovery tasks throughout information and legal lifecycles yet concise enough to be realistically approached from an automation perspective.” It illustrates how daunting the challenge can be by looking at the results of the Information Governance Initiative’s Annual Survey for 2015-16 to see how many types of discovery dependent products are considered as part of the information governance technology ecosystem – 22 technologies in all, from records and information management to compliance to data science.

One of the most interesting things about the post is the differentiation between Legal Discovery (a.k.a. Electronic Discovery, which is defined as “the process of identifying, preserving, collecting, processing, searching, reviewing and producing electronically stored information that may be relevant to a civil, criminal, or regulatory matter”) and Data Discovery (which is defined as “the exploration of patterns and trends within unstructured data with the objective of uncovering insight and driving action”). As the diagram above illustrates, there are (not just one, but) two types of discovery, each with its own set of processes and tasks.

I’ve been increasingly interested in efforts to manage information prior to commencement of the legal process and the term “Data Discovery” seems very appropriate to reference those activities.

Another interesting thought about the framework is the idea of a fifth generation of eDiscovery offerings. Just when you got used to four generations, there’s a fifth! As Rob notes, the “characteristics of a fifth generation eDiscovery offering would be the adaptation of current data discovery offerings for use with offerings that were designed for eDiscovery, designed for eDiscovery task integration, and designed for eDiscovery task automation”.

Great article, and it saves me having to do a lot of writing on a travel day back from DC and The Masters Conference (with a bad cold, to boot). Thanks, Rob!

So, what do you think? Do you think of discovery as just related to litigation? As always, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Masters Conference DC, Day Two: eDiscovery Trends

As we indicated yesterday and Monday, The Masters Conference has been going on in Washington DC! Today’s the last day! Let’s take a look at today’s events!

The conference is being held at the Capital Hilton, 1001 16th St NW, Washington, DC 20036. Registration begins at 7:30am again today, with sessions starting at 8:30am.

Here is the list of today’s sessions:

8:30am – 9:30am:

Multiple Strengths, One Goal: Building Rock Star Diverse Teams

Moderator: Zelda Owens, CSSGB, Panelists: Aaron Crews, Debbie Reynolds, Mary Ellen Connerty, Monica Bay

Moving from Models to Standards: Next Steps in Maturing the Industry

Moderator: Eric P. Mandel, Panelists: Eli Nelson, Kevin Clark, Sunil Ohri, Tara Emory

9:45am – 10:45am:

The Five Forces Impacting Corporate eDiscovery: Five forces on how to save corporations money, locate your documents quicker, make fewer mistakes and make you look like a star. This panel discusses practical ways to leverage technology so you can do more of what you do best as a lawyer. Learn to trust the technology to make you more efficient and more profitable.

Moderator: Adam Kuhn, Panelists: Aaron Crews, Ethan Ackerman, Michael E. Lackey, Neguiel Hicks

FRCP: Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: The Early Returns: This presentation will review the proposed changes to the FRCP, including e-Discovery conduct, insight into how federal judges are already thinking about the changes, and how to adjust your current and future litigation strategies and e-Discovery processes in light of the proposed amendments. The legal community will definitely be altered in the coming years as a direct result of the FRCP alterations. Get the jump on any surprises with this informative and interesting presentation.

Moderator: Ralph Colby Losey, Panelists: Cheryl A. Feeley, David Kinzer, Jennifer A. Brennan

11:00am – 12:00pm:

Revealing the New Privacy World of the EU/US Privacy Shield and the GDPR

Moderator: Evelyn Minnick, Panelists: James Daley, Nikos Leoutsarakos, Paul A. Meyer.

“Seeing is believing” – How Video is Changing the Way We Win Cases

Moderator: Ian Campbell, Panelists: Chad Papenfuss, Deena Coffman, Robert DeBord, Susan Taylor.

12:15pm to 1:35pm:

Explore today’s best practices for investigations, ranging from internal investigations to highly complex regulatory investigations

Moderator: Krista Fuller, Panelists: Aaron Crews, Antonia Rahneva, John Rosenthal, Thomas Matzen.

1:45pm – 2:45pm:

Latest Cybersecurity Trends in Government

Moderator: James Bourie, Panelists: Allison Bender, Donald Codling, Justin Zeefe.

Faster, Bigger, Better eDiscovery: Leveraging Technology to its Fullest: As the volume of information grows, corporations are pushing outside counsel to find cheaper and more efficient ways to handle eDiscovery. However, today’s litigation is too often forged without a master plan – plagued by errors, delays and unnecessary expense. What’s needed is a more streamlined, systematic approach to curb the drain on time and resources that eDiscovery has become. In this session, industry experts will address how to best leverage a variety of technologies to help drive down client costs and increase productivity.

Topics include:

  • TAR and leveraging analytics
  • Unique file redactions
  • The future of technology in eDiscovery

Moderator: Bruce Markowitz, Panelists: Antigone Peyton, Oral Pottinger, Paul A. Meyer, Robert D. Keeling.

3:00pm – 4:00pm:

Cybersecurity: and in House perspective: Join two top in-house lawyers. To hear about how they address top cybersecurity issues internally and externally.

Moderator: Christina Ayiotis, Panelists: Hilary Hageman, Michelle Beistle.

Streamline eDiscovery Workflows that Deming would Love

Moderator: Tammy Doss, Panelists: Allison Stanton, Nick Carter, Shea Leitch

4:15pm – 5:15pm:

JUDGES PANEL

Panelist: Hon. Ronald J. Hedges.

There will also be a happy hour at 6pm “focused on enjoying and reflecting on the next 10 years”.

So, what do you think? Did you attend The Masters Conference this week? If so, what did you think? And, as always, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Masters Conference DC, Day One: eDiscovery Trends

As we indicated yesterday, The Masters Conference is going on today and tomorrow in Washington DC!  Let’s take a look at today’s events!

The conference is being held at the Capital Hilton, 1001 16th St NW, Washington, DC 20036.  Registration begins at 7:30am on Tuesday, with sessions starting at 8:45am.  Sessions run all day Tuesday and Wednesday.

Here is the list of today’s sessions:

8:30am – 10:45am:

Intro to becoming a Certified eDiscovery Specialist: Mary Mack and Helen Bergman Moure will be presenting LIVE Part One of The CEDS Online Exam Prep Seminar which is the ultimate tool to guide you through all the steps of the e-discovery process and prepare you for the CEDS Certification exam.

Part One Seminar topics include:

  • Information Management and Litigation Readiness
  • Project Planning
  • Litigation Hold Implementation

Participants are eligible for a substantially discounted price on the balance of the Certified eDiscovery Specialist training package.

11:00am – 12:00pm:

Future of eDiscovery: Riding the Analytics Revolution: Big Data plays a big role in litigation for many law firms and organizations. Having the ability to cull down your data earlier in the litigation cycle enables your firm or organization to work more efficiently and competitively. Technology is increasingly playing a key role in helping firms and organizations effectively identify and manage the data most important to your litigation. This session will discuss the emerging trends around analytics in eDiscovery, and how your firm or organization can implement best practices to ensure the highest quality results at a lower cost than traditional document reviews.

Moderator: Tom O’Connor, Panelists: Jeannine M. Kenney, Sunil Ohri, Tracy D. Drynan.

The Internet of Things (IoT) Creates a Thousand Points of (Evidentiary) Light. Can You See It?: The Web 3.0 has been dubbed the “Internet of Things”. This is an ecosystem of interconnected sensory devices that perform coordinated preprogramed – and even learned – tasks without the need for continuous human input. Combined with existing data sources (ie. e-mail, social media, smart phones, enterprise applications, and system logs), this represents an extremely rich source of data.

Within that data lies evidence. Valuable evidence.

Also within that data lies duty, obligation, risk, and opportunity for litigators. Join us for a discussion about the internet of Things, and all things structured, and how it fits (or doesn’t fit) within the EDRM.

Moderator: Charlie Platt, Panelists: Don Meyers, Mason Pan, Nick Kaywork.

12:00pm to 1:30pm:

10 Years Back, 10 Years Forward: The Evolution of Automation in eDiscovery: This unique session highlights the progress of eDiscovery technologies during the last decade and looks forward through the lens of innovation to the next ten years data discovery. This information-packed session includes some of the world’s foremost authorities on eDiscovery who will be sharing their thoughts, considerations, and recommended best practices for the use of Technology-Assisted Review. The session format will allow each expert an opportunity to present followed by a short dialogue. Additionally, the conclusion of this expanded lunchtime session will recognize at a high-level the aggregate recommendations of this expert panel.

Moderator: Mary Mack, Panelists: Bill Dimm, Bill Speros, David Horrigan, Doug Austin, George Socha.

1:45pm – 2:45pm:

Cybersecurity, eDiscovery, and Your Outside Counsel: What you don’t know CAN hurt you: As technology adoption gains strength across the legal industry, and both corporate counsel and law firms expand their use of outsourced vendors for legal support services such as eDiscovery, understanding data privacy and information security risks has become a critical element of vendor and law firm management for every company.

With the number of threats, hacks, and breaches at an all-time high, what you don’t know about your vendors’ cybersecurity practices can hurt you. This session will explore:

  • Common cybersecurity challenges in today’s legal and eDiscovery environment
  • Hidden issues and “land minds” that can increase your data security risks
  • Managing security with offshore vendors: Risky proposition or smart solution?
  • Beyond ISO 27001 basics: Advanced methods for protecting client data

Plus, attendees will receive a valuable take away tool, Evaluating Cybersecurity Practices: 10 Questions to Ask Outside Counsel and eDiscovery Vendors.

Moderator: Christian Dodd, Panelists: Antonella Commiato, David M. Hickey, Ken Smiley.

Benefits and Challenges in Creating an Information Governance (IG) Program: Information governance is a comparatively new concept and is evolving fast. Gartner defines information governance as the specification of decision rights and an accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in the valuation, creation, storage, use, archival and deletion of information. It includes the processes, roles, standards and metrics that ensure the effective and efficient use of information in enabling an organization to achieve its goals. In this panel discussion we will discuss building and enhancing your information governance program. Attendees will learn about how this impacts downstream and what it means for you the e-Discovery professional.

Moderator: Dan Elam, Panelists: Carlos A. Leon, Kenya Parrish-Dixon, Esq., CEDS, Leigh Isaacs.

3:00pm – 4:00pm:

Analytics in our Community covering the pros and cons of the latest trends

Moderator: Richard Clark, Panelists: Anthony (AJ) Dobson, Ethan Ackerman, Paul Gettmann.

Spanning the gap: Discovery Counsel and Project Management

Moderator: Alexander Lewis, Panelists: Antigone Peyton, Bryant Gauthier, Ellen Pyle

 

4:15pm – 5:15pm:

Cybersecurity Bridging the GAP between Cybersecurity and The Legal Community

Moderator: Kevin Clark, Panelists: Leigh Isaacs, Scott Bilbrey, Susan Taylor.

Legal Project Management

Moderator: Bruce Malter, CEDS, Panelists: Ian D. McCauley, Michael Quartararo, Scott Bilbrey

CloudNine will be co-sponsoring the Happy Hour with ACEDS at 5:30pm, followed by the 10th Anniversary Masters Awards Gala dinner, which is benefiting the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Click here to register for the conference.  It’s not too late!

So, what do you think?  Are you going to The Masters Conference this week?  If so, come join us!  And, as always, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by CloudNine. eDiscovery Daily is made available by CloudNine solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Daily should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.