Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.
Court Rules Plaintiff’s Duty to Preserve Did Not Extend to Employee’s Internet History: eDiscovery Case Law
Court Rules Plaintiff’s Duty to Preserve Did Not Extend to Employee’s Internet History: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Marten Transport, Ltd. V. Plattform Advertising, Inc., Kansas Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James denied the defendant’s Motion for Spoliation Sanctions, ruling that, although the plaintiff had a duty to preserve relevant ESI as of Fall 2013, that duty to preserve did not extend to the internet history of one of its employees until June 2015, and by then the internet history was lost.

read more
Ex-Employee Sues Volkswagen Claiming He Was Fired for Refusing to Spoliate Documents: eDiscovery Trends
Ex-Employee Sues Volkswagen Claiming He Was Fired for Refusing to Spoliate Documents: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

The troubles for Volkswagen continue into the electronic discovery arena. According to the Courthouse News Service, an ex-employee of the company has filed suit, claiming that he was fired for refusing to take part in an alleged three-day purge of documents related to the automaker’s emissions-cheating scandal known as “Dieselgate”.

read more
I Tell Ya, Review Attorneys Get No Respect, No Respect at All: eDiscovery Trends
I Tell Ya, Review Attorneys Get No Respect, No Respect at All: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

As the volume of data in the world doubles as frequently as every 1.2 years, the challenges to manage that data in discovery compound significantly as well. With review being the biggest component of the discovery process – as much as 80% of the cost of eDiscovery – review attorneys have become a significant participant in that review process (even in some cases where technology assisted review may be used). That doesn’t mean that review attorneys get the respect that they may deserve.

read more
Plaintiff’s Failure to Demonstrate Allegations Leads to Summary Judgment for Defendant: eDiscovery Case Law
Plaintiff’s Failure to Demonstrate Allegations Leads to Summary Judgment for Defendant: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, in a case of dueling summary judgment motions, Illinois Magistrate Judge Geraldine Soat Brown denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, but granted the defendant’s summary motion in its entirety, concluding that the plaintiff had not presented sufficient evidence to prove its allegations of illegally downloading movies.

read more
New Survey Shows Biggest Concerns of Legal Professionals Regarding Cloud and Shadow IT: eDiscovery Trends
New Survey Shows Biggest Concerns of Legal Professionals Regarding Cloud and Shadow IT: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

A big topic during LegalTech New York (LTNY) last month were the issues and concerns associated with information governance (IG) as it applies to the use of “Shadow IT” applications, including those that are cloud-based. A new survey, actually conducted during LTNY, was released earlier this week that sheds light on those concerns of legal technology professionals.

read more
Details Released on the New EU-US Privacy Shield: eDiscovery Trends
Details Released on the New EU-US Privacy Shield: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

As we discussed last month, the EU-US Privacy Shield, an important new framework for transatlantic data flows was announced on February 2. Within the same month, the European Commission released details on the new trans-Atlantic data transfer arrangement.

read more
Ralph Losey of Jackson Lewis, LLP: eDiscovery Trends
Ralph Losey of Jackson Lewis, LLP: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

This is the eighth and final of the 2016 LegalTech New York (LTNY) Thought Leader Interview series. eDiscovery Daily interviewed several thought leaders at LTNY this year to get their observations regarding trends at the show and generally within the eDiscovery industry. Unlike previous years, some of the questions posed to each thought leader were tailored to their position in the industry, so we have dispensed with the standard questions we normally ask all thought leaders.

read more
Predictive Coding is Officially Approved in First English Case: eDiscovery Case Law
Predictive Coding is Officially Approved in First English Case: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

Last month, in Pyrrho Investments Ltd v MWB Property Ltd, citing the landmark DaSilva Moore case (among other authorities), Master Matthews approved the use of predictive coding, due to the “enormous” expense of manually searching through the three million electronic documents associated with the case. This is the believed to be the first time an English court has approved the use of predictive coding.

read more
Pete Feinberg of Consilio: eDiscovery Trends
Pete Feinberg of Consilio: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

Today’s thought leader is Pete Feinberg. Pete is Senior Vice President of Product Strategy at Consilio, responsible for the overall product strategy and product management of Consilio’s products and services line. Prior to joining Consilio, Pete ran marketing for the largest vertical of Blackboard – a Washington DC-based education technology company. Prior to that, Pete served as vice president in various product, partner marketing and eCommerce roles at a variety of B2B software and B2C eRetail companies in the Washington DC area. Pete’s specialties are in guiding product strategy, bringing new products and services to market, representing the voice of the client as an executive “client advocate”, and guiding the service delivery organization to engage with clients not as a vendor, but instead as a trusted advisor.

read more
Chris Dale of The eDisclosure Information Project: eDiscovery Trends
Chris Dale of The eDisclosure Information Project: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

Today’s thought leader is Chris Dale Chris is director of the UK-based eDisclosure Information Project. Chris qualified as an English solicitor in 1980 after reading History at Oxford. He was a litigation partner in London and then a litigation software developer and litigation support consultant before turning to commentary on electronic disclosure / discovery. The e-Disclosure Information Project disseminates information about the court rules, the problems, and the technology to lawyers and their clients, to judges, and to suppliers. He was a member of Senior Master Whitaker’s Working Party which drafted Practice Direction 31B and the Electronic Documents Questionnaire. Chris is also a well-known speaker and commentator in the UK, the US and other common law jurisdictions.

read more