In court on Monday, the FBI said that it might no longer need Apple’s assistance in opening an iPhone used by a gunman in the San Bernardino, Calif., rampage last year.
read moreIn InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC, et. al., California District Judge Jon S. Tigar, finding that the defendants “consciously disregarded their obligations to preserve relevant evidence” when they discarded various electronic devices after experiencing an alleged power surge without checking to see if they could recover any files from them, granting an adverse inference instruction sanction and plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees.
read moreLet’s get our kicks on Route 66! Sixty six months ago yesterday, eDiscovery Daily was launched. It’s hard to believe that it has been 5 1/2 years since our first three posts debuted on our first day, September 20, 2010. Twice a year, we like to take a look back at some of the important stories and topics during that time. So, here are just a few of the posts over the last six months you may have missed. Enjoy!
read moreI probably shouldn’t be writing about this as it will give my wife Paige another reason to say that we should get one of these. Nonetheless, Craig Ball’s latest blog post illustrates how much data can be, and is being, captured these days in our everyday life. Now, if we could just get to that data when we need it for legal purposes.
read moreIn Marten Transport, Ltd. V. Plattform Advertising, Inc., Kansas Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James denied the defendant’s Motion for Spoliation Sanctions, ruling that, although the plaintiff had a duty to preserve relevant ESI as of Fall 2013, that duty to preserve did not extend to the internet history of one of its employees until June 2015, and by then the internet history was lost.
read moreThe troubles for Volkswagen continue into the electronic discovery arena. According to the Courthouse News Service, an ex-employee of the company has filed suit, claiming that he was fired for refusing to take part in an alleged three-day purge of documents related to the automaker’s emissions-cheating scandal known as “Dieselgate”.
read moreAs the volume of data in the world doubles as frequently as every 1.2 years, the challenges to manage that data in discovery compound significantly as well. With review being the biggest component of the discovery process – as much as 80% of the cost of eDiscovery – review attorneys have become a significant participant in that review process (even in some cases where technology assisted review may be used). That doesn’t mean that review attorneys get the respect that they may deserve.
read moreIn Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, in a case of dueling summary judgment motions, Illinois Magistrate Judge Geraldine Soat Brown denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, but granted the defendant’s summary motion in its entirety, concluding that the plaintiff had not presented sufficient evidence to prove its allegations of illegally downloading movies.
read moreA big topic during LegalTech New York (LTNY) last month were the issues and concerns associated with information governance (IG) as it applies to the use of “Shadow IT” applications, including those that are cloud-based. A new survey, actually conducted during LTNY, was released earlier this week that sheds light on those concerns of legal technology professionals.
read moreAs we discussed last month, the EU-US Privacy Shield, an important new framework for transatlantic data flows was announced on February 2. Within the same month, the European Commission released details on the new trans-Atlantic data transfer arrangement.
read more|
On-Premise Processing and Review offer unique advantages that the cloud alone can’t replicate. Make an informed decision. |
