You have to love an instructional guide that begins with a picture of Milton Waddams (the sad sack employee obsessing over his red stapler in the movie Office Space) and ends with a nice consolidated list of ten practice tips for backups in discovery.
read moreIn Stormo v. City of Sioux Falls, et. al., South Dakota District Judge Karen E. Schreier, ruling on several motions, denied the plaintiff’s motion to compel with regard to requiring the defendants to provide electronically stored information in its native format and metadata for these documents, but granted it with regard to providing an index explaining information about the documents.
read moreWhen a new case is filed, there are several important decisions that the lead attorney has to make. Those decisions that are made early in the life cycle of a case can significantly affect how discovery is managed and how costly the discovery process can be for that case. Decision trees enable attorneys to work through the decision process up front to help them make sound, logical decisions which can lead to more efficient management of the discovery process.
read moreIn Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, et. al. v. BendTec, Inc., Minnesota District Judge Michael J. Davis found that the decision in Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. to deny certain eDiscovery costs to be persuasive and ruled that “the costs of creating and maintaining an electronic platform for e-discovery are not recoverable under § 1920(4)”, denying the prevailing defendant’s request for reimbursement of over $123,000 in costs to maintain their ESI database.
read moreThis is not an April Fool’s Joke! Just when New York City thought it was safe from eDiscovery professionals – we’re all coming back for the ACEDS conference! And, eDiscovery Daily and CloudNine will be a part of the show!
read moreWhen the big guys sue each other, the cases last forever. We’ve been covering developments in the Apple v. Samsung case since July 2012, and that case is still going on. Another case that we’ve covered a long time ago (way back in November 2011) is Oracle Corp. v. Google Inc. and that case is still going on too. In that case, with a trial approaching, the judge has told lawyers to disclose Internet and social media research about jurors to the court or agree not to conduct it.
read moreLet’s face it, there are a lot of eDiscovery vendors out there. But, how do you find out which vendor is right for you? Ask a lot of questions, of course! Here is an article that provides several good ones to ask.
read moreLast week, we reported that the FBI said that it might no longer need Apple’s assistance in opening an iPhone used by a gunman in the San Bernardino, Calif., rampage last year. Looks like that was the case.
read moreIf you follow eDiscovery, you probably have heard of the Zubulake case, which is probably the most famous case in eDiscovery. The judge from that case — Shira A. Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York – is retiring effective April 29.
read moreIn Moore v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC, Washington District Judge Robert J. Bryan ruled in favor of the plaintiff that documents and communications dated before the defendant anticipated litigation were not privileged work product and should be produced, but he ruled against the plaintiff in her request have the defendant perform additional searches on email to identify additional relevant documents.
read more|
On-Premise Processing and Review offer unique advantages that the cloud alone can’t replicate. Make an informed decision. |
