It was such a success last year, we decided to do it again this year! At Legaltech, CloudNine will once again be conducting NineForum – our series of TED-style talk sessions right from our booth! And, we have another terrific group of eDiscovery thought leaders to present on great topics!
read moreLast Friday, we covered one updated commentary from The Sedona Conference® (TSC) and promised to cover another one this week. Consider our promise kept!
read moreLast week, we covered the government’s latest attempt (and Apple’s resistance) to get Apple to assist in unlocking the iPhones of a mass shooter – this time, with regard to password-protected iPhones used by Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, who is suspected of killing three people last month in a shooting at a Navy base in Pensacola, Florida. Ultimately, however, it may not matter whether Apple helps the government or not.
read moreSo many stories, so little time. Been meaning to cover this for a few days now. Last week, The Sedona Conference® (TSC) and its Working Group 1 on Electronic Document Retention & Production (WG1) announced the publication of the Public Comment Version of The Sedona Conference Commentary on Rule 45 Subpoenas to Non-Parties, Second Edition.
read moreRemember back in 2016 when Apple with in a court battle with the Department of Justice over giving investigators access to encrypted data on the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters? That was back in 2016 and we covered the story on the blog back then – that situation was resolved when the DOJ indicated that the FBI was able to retrieve the data with help from an “unnamed third party”. Now, Apple is in a new dispute with the government again over the same issue.
read moreIt’s that time again! I’m here to cover the results of the Winter 2020 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey, published (as always) on Rob Robinson’s terrific Complex Discovery site. So, how […]
read moreIn Kamuda et al. v. Sterigenics U.S., LLC et al., Circuit Court Judge Christopher E. Lawler ruled that “[u]nder Illinois Supreme Court Rules 201(b)(4) and 214(b), the parties should produce all ESI in the respective native formats”, agreeing that Rule 214 entitles Plaintiffs to their requested ESI format and rejecting the defendants’ offered compromise to produce some of the ESI in native format, but not all.
read moreA two-topic day for us with a couple of terrific educational opportunities! One free CLE educational program in Houston comes up in just ten days! And, the other happens in Florida and currently has early bird pricing available for a wonderful full day conference in March!
read moreAs we noted yesterday, eDiscovery Daily published 66 posts related to eDiscovery case decisions and activities over the past year, covering 56 unique cases! Yesterday, we looked back at cases related to passwords and Fifth Amendment protection, non-party discovery and mobile and messaging. Today, let’s take a look back at cases related to cooperation, form of production, privilege and confidentiality disputes, social media related disputes and a key case regarding biometric security.
read moreIt’s that time of year again! Time for our annual review of eDiscovery case law! This is our ninth(!) annual review of cases that we covered on the eDiscovery Daily blog over the past year. As always, we had a number of interesting cases related to various eDiscovery topics. So, as we have done for the last eight(!) years, let’s take a look back at 2019!
read more|
On-Premise Processing and Review offer unique advantages that the cloud alone can’t replicate. Make an informed decision. |
