Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.
Close
Enter your
text here
It’s E-Discovery Day 2019! Check Out Today’s Webcasts and In Person Events!: eDiscovery Best Practices
 It’s E-Discovery Day 2019! Check Out Today’s Webcasts and In Person Events!: eDiscovery Best Practices 403 94 CloudNine

It’s time for another E-Discovery Day!  By my count, this is the fifth annual event that includes a combination of webcasts and in-person events to promote discussion and education of eDiscovery (we won’t hold it against them that they want to spell it with that pesky dash).  Here are links to some of the webcasts and in-person events happening today!

read more
Here’s Something that Canada and South Carolina Have in Common: eDiscovery Trends
 Here’s Something that Canada and South Carolina Have in Common: eDiscovery Trends 746 426 CloudNine

They both just recently adopted changes to their rules of professional conduct that include a duty of technology competence.

read more
Court Denies Criminal Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained via Warrantless Search: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Denies Criminal Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained via Warrantless Search: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 CloudNine

In United States v. Caputo, Oregon District Judge Karin J. Immergut denied the defendant’s motion to suppress emails and evidence derived from a warrantless search of Defendant’s workplace email account, finding “any expectation of privacy in Defendant’s work email was objectively unreasonable under the military’s computer-use policies in effect at his workplace.”

read more
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Forcing Provision of Computer Password Violates the Fifth Amendment: eDiscovery Case Law
 Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Forcing Provision of Computer Password Violates the Fifth Amendment: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 CloudNine

In Commonwealth v. Davis, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in a 4-3 ruling, overturned a lower-court order that required a criminal suspect to turn over a 64-character password to his computer, concluding that “compelling the disclosure of a password to a computer, that is, the act of production, is testimonial” and rejecting the Commonwealth’s argument that provision of the password was a foregone conclusion, finding that “the prohibition of application of the foregone conclusion rationale to areas of compulsion of one’s mental processes would be entirely consistent with” US Supreme Court decisions.

read more
It’s Time for Your Annual “Mashup” of eDiscovery Market Estimates!: eDiscovery Trends
 It’s Time for Your Annual “Mashup” of eDiscovery Market Estimates!: eDiscovery Trends 518 359 CloudNine

The appearance of the mashed potato graphic can only mean one thing. Nope, not that it’s Thanksgiving week (though, many of us will enjoy our mashed potatoes this Thursday). It means that it’s time for the eDiscovery Market Size Mashup that Rob Robinson compiles and presents on his Complex Discovery site each year.

read more
Here’s a Webcast to Learn about Important eDiscovery Developments for 2019: eDiscovery Webcasts
 Here’s a Webcast to Learn about Important eDiscovery Developments for 2019: eDiscovery Webcasts 590 392 CloudNine

I know it seems like we just conducted a webcast (we did, three days ago), but we already have another one coming up! 2019 was another busy year from an eDiscovery, cybersecurity and data privacy standpoint. What do you need to know about those important 2019 events? Here’s a webcast that will discuss what you need to know about important 2019 events and how they impact your eDiscovery efforts.

read more
Exceptions are the Rule: eDiscovery Throwback Thursdays
 Exceptions are the Rule: eDiscovery Throwback Thursdays 600 420 CloudNine

Virtually every collection of electronically stored information (ESI) has at least some files that cannot be effectively searched. Corrupt files, password protected files and other types of exception files are pretty much constant components of your ESI collection and it can become very expensive to make these files searchable or reviewable. Being without an effective plan for addressing these files could lead to problems – even spoliation claims – in your case.

read more
Another Sign That Companies Aren’t Ready for CCPA Yet: Data Privacy Trends
 Another Sign That Companies Aren’t Ready for CCPA Yet: Data Privacy Trends 291 326 CloudNine

As we’ve reported several times (including just last week), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is scheduled to go into effect on January 1 next year. That’s only 42 days from now! Here’s another sign that companies still aren’t ready for it yet.

read more
Today’s Webcast Will Discuss the DOS and DON’TS of 30(b)(6) Witness Depositions: eDiscovery Webcasts
 Today’s Webcast Will Discuss the DOS and DON’TS of 30(b)(6) Witness Depositions: eDiscovery Webcasts 461 263 CloudNine

As we learned in Tom O’Connor’s recent six part blog series, Rule 30(b)(6) permits a party to notice or subpoena the deposition of an organization which then must then designate one or more individuals who consent to testify on its behalf about information “known or reasonably available to the organization.” But, how should it be conducted to maximize the discovery obtained, what are some strategies to consider to help ensure a successful deposition and what are some common mistakes to avoid? And, what are some eDiscovery related topics about which a 30(b)(6) witness should be prepared to testify? Today’s webcast that will answer those questions – and more!

read more
Court Denies Motion to Redact Portions of eDiscovery Teleconference: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Denies Motion to Redact Portions of eDiscovery Teleconference: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 CloudNine

In Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Tech., Inc. et al., Delaware Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall denied the defendants’ Motion to Redact Portions of the August 14, 2019 Discovery Teleconference and the related submissions, stating: “The public has an interest in understanding judicial proceedings, even if they have a limited interest in documents submitted in connection with discovery dispute proceedings.”

read more