An important part of managing a project is effectively managing the people doing the work and keeping them motivated. This is especially critical when you need a lot of people for a task – for example, a document review project. One weak link can result in poor work that needs to be redone.
read moreProject documentation is a weakness that I’ve seen time and again in firms that I’ve helped. And, I’ve seen it cause problems over and over again. I’ve worked with attorneys who have done a great job of collecting and producing documents, but, nonetheless, they have trouble successfully resolving discovery disputes. Why? Because they didn’t keep records of what they did and how they did it.
read moreeDiscovery sanctions are at an all-time high, according to a Duke Law Journal law review article. The article summarizes a study of 401 cases involving motions for sanctions related to discovery of electronically stored information (ESI) in federal courts through 2009, with a total of 230 sanction awards in those cases. In an increasing number of cases, more attention is focused on eDiscovery than on the merits, with a motion for sanctions becoming very common.
read moreI have run into this issue more times than I can count. A client sends me a list of search terms that they want to use to cull a set of data for review in a Microsoft Word document. I copy the terms into the search tool and then, all hell breaks loose!! Either: The search indicates there is a syntax error — OR — The search returns some obviously odd results. And, then, I remember. It’s those stupid Word “smart quotes”.
read moreIt’s critical to know where you are on a project so you can compare your progress to your budget and schedule and make adjustments if necessary. Sometime the unexpected will cause you to fall behind. In some cases, you’ll be able to take steps to fix problems and get back on track. For example, you may be able to simplify a task without sacrificing quality or the utility of the work.
read moreEmail is dead. So says Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Facebook announced last week that it’s rolling out a new messaging system, including chat, text messaging, status updates and email (surprise!). Will the integrated product (informally dubbed “Facemail”) that some have called “Gmail killer” be a serious threat to Gmail, MSN and Yahoo Mail? And, what will that mean from an eDiscovery standpoint?
read moreLast month, The Sedona Conference® made available its Commentary on Proportionality in Electronic Discovery, which is a project of The Sedona Conference Working Group on Electronic Document Retention & Production (WG1). The commentary is initially being published as a “public comment version”, giving participants in the legal industry an opportunity to provide comments that the editors will review and incorporate edits where appropriate into the final version. A copy of the PDF publication can be downloaded here.
read moreLast month, at the EDRM Mid-Year Meetings, the Information Management Reference Model (IMRM) team within EDRM presented a status report for their project (as all of the project teams do during these meetings). As a part of that presentation, the team presented findings from the first survey conducted by the Compliance, Governance and Oversight Council (CGOC) in collaboration with the IMRM of legal, records management (RIM) and IT practitioners in Global 1000 companies.
read moreYesterday, we talked about resolving questions quickly and keeping team members informed about changes to procedures to minimize the chance for significant rework. However, even with the best staff, mistakes happen — especially on projects that require a team of people. There are two general types of errors you can expect.
read moreEven with the best procedures and thorough training, people who are new to a task will likely have questions. Nuances in a document collection and unexpected situations will surface that don’t fit into your rules. It is very important that questions are resolved quickly. Most document work is repetitive. Many questions, therefore, will apply to more than one document. If a question is not resolved quickly, there is a good chance that many documents will be affected, and you may face significant rework.
read more|
On-Premise Processing and Review offer unique advantages that the cloud alone can’t replicate. Make an informed decision. |
