Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.
Order for Financial Records and Facebook Conversations Modified Due to Privacy Rights – eDiscovery Case Law
Order for Financial Records and Facebook Conversations Modified Due to Privacy Rights – eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Stallings v. City of Johnston City, Illinois Chief District Judge David R. Herndon modified an earlier order by a magistrate judge in response to the plaintiff’s appeal, claiming that the order violated the privacy rights of the plaintiff, and of minor children with whom the plaintiff had held conversations on Facebook.

read more
Revised Federal Rule Amendments One Step Closer – eDiscovery Trends
Revised Federal Rule Amendments One Step Closer – eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

As noted by a recent article in Law Technology News, a revised package of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) is one step closer to being adopted.

read more
Want My Production? Here’s my Database! – eDiscovery Trends
Want My Production? Here’s my Database! – eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

A couple of weeks ago, we covered a case where the US Government was ordered to continue providing access to an eDiscovery database to a defendant in a criminal case. That case shed light on a growing trend in the industry that I have also observed personally – “producing” documents to opposing counsel by providing access to the documents via a hosted eDiscovery solution.

read more
Portions of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel eDiscovery Ruled as “Overbroad” and “Moot” Reaffirmed by District Court – eDiscovery Case Law
Portions of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel eDiscovery Ruled as “Overbroad” and “Moot” Reaffirmed by District Court – eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Elkharwily v. Mayo Holding Co., Minnesota District Judge David S. Doty overruled the plaintiff’s objection to a magistrate judge’s order that denied in part the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, labeling some requests as overbroad or moot, particularly after the defendant contended it had already produced the requested discovery materials.

read more
Court Denies Defendant’s Request for Deposition Regarding Plaintiff’s Discovery Search Tools – eDiscovery Case Law
Court Denies Defendant’s Request for Deposition Regarding Plaintiff’s Discovery Search Tools – eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Hunt Control Sys., Inc., New Jersey Magistrate Judge James B. Clark III granted the plaintiff’s protective order to prevent the defendant from proceeding with a new deposition to review whether the plaintiff had used “appropriate search tools for ESI discovery,” after the requested discovery documents had already been produced.

read more
Richard G. Braman: 1953 – 2014
Richard G. Braman: 1953 – 2014 150 150 CloudNine

I learned from Ralph Losey’s excellent blog, e-Discovery Team ®, that Richard Braman, the Founder and Executive Director Emeritus of The Sedona Conference®, passed away on Monday after battling an extended illness. He was only 60 years old.

read more
The Pitfalls of Self-Culling and Image Files – eDiscovery Best Practices
The Pitfalls of Self-Culling and Image Files – eDiscovery Best Practices 150 150 CloudNine

There’s a common mistake that organizations make when collecting their own files to turn over for discovery purposes. Many attorneys turn over the collection of potentially responsive files to the individual custodians of those files, or to someone in the organization responsible for collecting those files (typically, an IT person) and the self-collection involves “self-culling” through the use of search terms. When this happens, important files can be missed.

read more
Court Rules that Unilateral Predictive Coding is Not Progressive – eDiscovery Case Law
Court Rules that Unilateral Predictive Coding is Not Progressive – eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In In Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Delaney, Nevada Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen determined that the plaintiff’s unannounced shift from the agreed upon discovery methodology, to a predictive coding methodology for privilege review was not cooperative. Therefore, the plaintiff was ordered to produce documents that met agreed-upon search terms without conducting a privilege review first.

read more
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant – eDiscovery Case Law
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant – eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In the criminal case of United States v. Shabudin, California Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas ordered the Government to continue to provide access to a Relativity Database used by the parties to review documents produced by the Government, instead of discontinuing access for the defendants several weeks before trial was to begin due to budgetary issues.

read more
eDiscovery at the Movies – eDiscovery Trends
eDiscovery at the Movies – eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

While we don’t have Siskel & Ebert around to review movies anymore, there is a new documentary that will certainly merit review by many eDiscovery professionals out there.

read more