Duty to Preserve Triggered When Litigation is "Imminent", Not "Reasonably Foreseeable" – eDiscovery Case Law
Duty to Preserve Triggered When Litigation is "Imminent", Not "Reasonably Foreseeable" – eDiscovery Case Law https://cloudnine.com/wp-content/themes/cloudnine/images/empty/thumbnail.jpg 150 150 CloudNine https://cloudnine.com/wp-content/themes/cloudnine/images/empty/thumbnail.jpgIn the case In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, Chief District Judge David R. Herndon ruled that at least in the Seventh Circuit, the duty to preserve is triggered not when litigation is “reasonably foreseeable” but when “a litigant knew or should have known that litigation was imminent.”
read more