You might think that since I write a daily blog, I have no time to do any other writing on the side. And, a lot of times, that’s true. However, I wrote a guest blog post recently for our good friends and Kansas City partners at Complete Legal and so I’ve decided to point to that blog post for today to give our readers a chance to read that post.
read moreIn Lotus Indus., LLC v. Archer, Michigan Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti granted in part and denied in part without prejudice non-party City of Detroit Downtown Development Authority’s (DDA) motion for protective order in connection with the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s motion to compel documents requested by subpoena, ordering the plaintiff to pay some of DDA’s discovery costs, but not as much as DDA requested.
read moreIf you read my blog post on Tuesday, you saw my coverage of Craig Ball’s blog post regarding whether we’ve “lost the war” on eDiscovery. Craig particularly lamented the lack of focus on practical eDiscovery skills, especially in the eDiscovery conferences we attend, where they have moved on to “anti-discovery topics”, such as proportionality, privacy, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and cybersecurity. Certainly, that sentiment probably extends to publications as well, as we have covered a lot of those “anti-discovery” topics extensively. But we used to cover a lot more of the practical eDiscovery best practices in the early years of the blog. And, that got me thinking that maybe we should revisit some of those topics.
read moreAs we learned in Tom O’Connor’s recent five part blog series, it seems as though the eDiscovery deck is stacked against plaintiff’s attorneys. Defendants seem to have all the resources, the technical know-how and the interest of the major eDiscovery vendors while the plaintiffs often have few resources, technical knowledge or eDiscovery experience. How do plaintiff’s attorneys bridge that gap? Here’s a webcast that will help put those plaintiff’s attorneys on a more equal footing with their defendant counterparts.
read moreOn the veritable eve of the annual Georgetown Law Center eDiscovery Training Academy, Craig Ball (who is in the midst of that very academy now) has asked the question Have We Lost the War on E-Discovery? But, if you’re reading that (or this blog post), it probably doesn’t apply to you.
read moreIn Mafille v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co., Oklahoma Magistrate Judge Frank H. McCarthy, finding that the plaintiffs “have not demonstrated they have been prejudiced” by the loss of the plaintiff former employee’s work computer, denied the plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions “without prejudice to reassertion of the motion if through discovery it is determined that some specific evidence is beyond Plaintiffs’ reach” for the defendant’s “clear failure” to preserve the computer.
read moreDespite what the title might suggest, this is an eDiscovery related post, not a psychological one. Certifications have become increasingly important in eDiscovery today and a couple of recent events illustrate how “committed” CloudNine is to eDiscovery professionals who are “certifiable”.
read moreLast week, I read an article from Bob Ambrogi on Above the Law, that discussed his opinion (as well as that of Nicole Black, discussed in her Sui Generis blog) that the recently adopted Louisiana ethics opinion misses the mark with regard to guidance to lawyers regarding their ethical duty to understand technology. When I saw that, I reached out to my good buddy Tom O’Connor (and the longest tenured Louisiana attorney I know, sorry Craig), for his take. Did he agree with that assessment? As Tom put it in his own Techno Gumbo blog (channeling his internal Lee Corso), “not so fast, my friend”.
read moreDoes it seem like eDiscovery production always turns into a big production? It doesn’t have to do so. There are a number of steps you can take to minimize the stress, cost and rework associated with producing electronically stored information to opposing counsel as well as to ensure that their production to you is as useful as possible. Today’s webcast will help you learn the steps and concepts to keep your productions from turning into a big production.
read moreIn Kratz v. Scott Hotel Group, LLC, Indiana District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, stating “[t]o invoke schoolyard vernacular: no do-overs”, denied the defendant’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s decision not to compel the plaintiff to produce versions of an unredacted narrative of events associated with his hotel stays and interactions with hotel staff.
read more