CloudNine
One of the major topics discussed during last month’s panel discussion at The Masters Conference and also last week during our ACEDS webinar was the debate over the current state of judiciary acceptance of technology assisted review (TAR). Whether intentional or not, to help with that debate The Sedona Conference® has just published the Public Comment Version of a new TAR Case Law Primer.
read moreIf you regularly read sites that discuss legal technology and other important issues for the legal profession, you’re certainly familiar with the site Above the Law, which takes a behind the scenes look at the world of law and covers it on several levels, including big law, small firms, law schools, finance, CLE and, of course, eDiscovery. Regarding eDiscovery, their latest interview gives you an opportunity to learn more about our company, CloudNine.
read moreRemember when we discussed the issue of text overlays on image-only PDF files (typically represented as Bates numbers) and the problems they cause? Well, we found a variation to the issue that is even more of a problem.
read moreIn Moore v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, Washington District Judge Robert J. Bryan denied without prejudice the plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Defendant’s Willful Spoliation of Evidence for deleting her email account after she was terminated, finding a lack of duty preserve or bad faith on the defendant’s part and minimal (if any) prejudice to the plaintiff.
read moreOur webinar panel discussion conducted by ACEDS last week was highly attended, well reviewed and generated some interesting discussion. Were you unable to attend last week’s webinar? Good news, we have it for you here, on demand, whenever you want to check it out.
read more
If you’ve been reading our blog the past couple of days, you may have noticed that our blog has a new look. Here’s why.
read moreDo you ever wonder or worry about how securely your providers and partners handle your sensitive data during the discovery process? Then, this latest project from EDRM will help address those worries.
read moreToday is your chance to catch a terrific discussion about automation in eDiscovery and, particularly an in-depth discussion about technology assisted review (TAR) and whether it lives up to the current hype!
read moreIn Brown v BCA Trading, et. al., Mr. Registrar Jones ruled that, with “nothing, as yet, to suggest that predictive coding will not be able to identify the documents which would otherwise be identified through, for example, keyword search”, “predictive coding must be the way forward” in this dispute between parties as to whether the Respondents could use predictive coding to respond to eDisclosure requests.
read moreIn Hyles v. New York City, New York Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck, indicating that the key issue before the court in the discovery dispute between parties was whether (at the plaintiff’s request) the defendants can be forced to use technology assisted review, refused to force the defendant to do so, stating “The short answer is a decisive ‘NO.’”
read more