Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.
Close
Enter your
text here
Court Acknowledges Lack of Expertise to Recommend Search Methodology, Orders Parties to Confer: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Acknowledges Lack of Expertise to Recommend Search Methodology, Orders Parties to Confer: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In ACI Worldwide Corp. v. MasterCard Technologies, LLC and MasterCard International, Inc., Nebraska Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett, acknowledging that the Court “simply does not have the expertise necessary to determine the best methodology to be employed in retrieving the requested materials in a safe, non-obtrusive, and cost-effective manner”, ordered the parties to “once again” confer in an effort to reach an agreement regarding the search methodology to be employed by the defendants in retrieving the information requested by the plaintiff.

read more
Government Attorneys Are More Confident about eDiscovery But Feel Less Prepared to Discuss It: eDiscovery Trends
 Government Attorneys Are More Confident about eDiscovery But Feel Less Prepared to Discuss It: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

In April 2014, we covered the seventh annual benchmarking study of eDiscovery Practices for Government Agencies conducted by Deloitte and covered the eighth annual study last December. Apparently, Deloitte operates on an eight month year – their Ninth Annual Benchmarking Study of Electronic Discovery Practices for Government Agencies is available now.

read more
August Case Law Pop Quiz Answers!: eDiscovery Case Law
 August Case Law Pop Quiz Answers!: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

Yesterday, we gave you a pop quiz for the eDiscovery case law that we’ve covered recently. If you’re reading the blog each day, these questions should be easy! Let’s see how you did. Here are the answers.

read more
August Case Law Pop Quiz!: eDiscovery Case Law
 August Case Law Pop Quiz!: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

Here’s an opportunity to give you a chance to catch up on cases we’ve covered recently with a case law pop quiz! If you’re reading the blog each day, these questions should be easy! If not, we’ve provided a link to the post with the answer. We’re that nice. Test your knowledge! Tomorrow, we’ll post the answers to this pop quiz for those who don’t know and didn’t look them up.

read more
Want to Avoid eDiscovery “Gotchas”? Attend this Session at ILTA: eDiscovery Best Practices
 Want to Avoid eDiscovery “Gotchas”? Attend this Session at ILTA: eDiscovery Best Practices 150 150 CloudNine

There is less than two weeks left before ILTACON 2015, the annual conference for the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. eDiscovery Daily will be at the show and providing coverage before, during and after the show. If you’re attending (or thinking of attending), here is one session that you should put on your list to check out.

read more
Court Orders Plaintiff to Re-Review 95% of its Production Classified as “Highly Confidential”: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Orders Plaintiff to Re-Review 95% of its Production Classified as “Highly Confidential”: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc., after the plaintiff designated 95% of its forensically-produced documents (141,525 of 148,636) as “highly confidential”, Florida District Judge Jonathan Goodman ordered the plaintiff to re-review and re-designate those documents within ten days, and also assessed a $25,000 fees award against the plaintiff’s outside counsel to compensate the defendant for its efforts in reviewing the documents.

read more
Court Has a “Beef” with Plaintiff’s Proportionality Argument: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Has a “Beef” with Plaintiff’s Proportionality Argument: eDiscovery Case Law 150 150 CloudNine

In Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. v. Premium Beef Feeders, LLC, Kansas Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James granted the defendants’ motion to compel production of documents, overruling the plaintiffs’ objections to the discovery request in finding that “Plaintiff has not satisfied its burden to show that producing the requested documents would be unduly burdensome”.

read more
Rules Amendments Are Not Just Being Approved WITHIN DC, But Also FOR DC As Well: eDiscovery Trends
 Rules Amendments Are Not Just Being Approved WITHIN DC, But Also FOR DC As Well: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

We’ve been covering the progress of adoption of changes to the Federal Rules and the associated debate regarding the rules – especially Rule 37(e) – for over two years. Unless Congress introduces legislation to affect the timing or content of the rules, the rules will become effective on December 1 of this year. But, did you know that there are new rules amendments for the District of Columbia, as well?

read more
What’s Better than the Discovery Channel? The eDiscovery Channel!: eDiscovery Trends
 What’s Better than the Discovery Channel? The eDiscovery Channel!: eDiscovery Trends 150 150 CloudNine

If you’ve been a long time follower of this blog (or even not that long), you’re familiar with the thought leader interview series we conduct every year at LegalTech New York (LTNY). Now, you can listen to podcasts from a couple of eDiscovery thought leaders from the comfort of your own computer!

read more
Here are a Few Common Myths About Technology Assisted Review: eDiscovery Best Practices
 Here are a Few Common Myths About Technology Assisted Review: eDiscovery Best Practices 150 150 CloudNine

A couple of years ago, after my annual LegalTech New York interviews with various eDiscovery thought leaders, I wrote a post about some of the perceived myths that exist regarding Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and what it means to the review process. After a recent discussion with a client where their misperceptions regarding TAR were evident, it seemed appropriate to revisit this topic and debunk a few myths that others may believe as well.

read more