Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.

Today, You Can Help The “Luddite” Lawyer Learn to Embrace Technology: eDiscovery Webcasts

Technology Assisted Review (TAR) has been court approved for nearly seven years now and other technologies and approaches have been proven to save time and money while even improving quality within the discovery process. Yet, many lawyers still have yet to embrace these new technologies and approaches. Why, and what needs to happen to change things? Today’s webcast will take a look at what needs to happen to help the “Luddite” legal professional learn to embrace technology.

read more

Will Lawyers Ever Embrace Technology?: eDiscovery Best Practices

Law firms today possess technology tools which have been proven to save time and money while simultaneously improving quality within the discovery process. Two thirds of the states have enacted rules which impose lawyer’s ethical duty to understand technology. And, case after case shows judicial endorsement of both of these concepts. Why is it, then, that surveys continue to show that many lawyers have yet to embrace these new technologies and approaches?

read more

ACEDS Shows Why You Need Those Stinking Badges: eDiscovery Trends

If you love classic comedy movies like me, you probably love the classic Mel Brooks comedy Blazing Saddles. My favorite quote from that movie is when the bandido says “Badges? We don’t need no stinking badges!” Well, The Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) is showing that you do, in fact, need those stinking badges to prove you’re CEDS certified.

read more

Court Grants Motion to Quash Subpoena From Defunct Non-Party Entity: eDiscovery Case Law

In Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., Kansas Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale, finding that “the information requested by the subpoena has limited relevance and is not proportional to the needs of the case” and that the non-party entity (Vantage Foods) had established that its production would be unduly burdensome, granted Vantage’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas and denied the plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena as moot.

read more