As technology evolves, so does the volume of new data types. The evolution of emerging data requires a parallel shift in how law firms approach eDiscovery to meet the ever-changing needs of their clients. By expanding your firm’s ability effectively and accurately collect and analyze today’s data, you create new opportunities to offer better solutions while bringing more revenue into the organization.
read moreDuring self-collection, custodians are responsible for identifying and gathering potentially relevant ESI on their own. When conducted carefully, self-collection may be adequate and cost-effective for smaller cases. However, there are several risks involved.
read moreFinancial scams, identity theft, and ransomware attacks are just few ways in which criminals leverage technology for e-crimes. Through their criminal activity, offenders unwittingly create digital trails that are discoverable by forensic experts. On February 28, 2022 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM EST, the Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science will host a Zoom webinar to delve deeper into the complexities of e-crime and criminal investigations.
read moreSafeguarding a client’s personal information is an important obligation. Redactions protect client privacy by obscuring confidential, privileged, non-responsive, and personally identifiable information from relevant documents. Mistakes often embarrass or endanger the client’s safety. Other ramifications may include waived attorney-client privilege, malpractice lawsuits, suspension, and even disbarment.
read moreThe vast amount of file types associated with today’s modern data require an eDiscovery solution far beyond the traditional discovery supported by most review platforms. And, without the right technology to provide the context needed to tell the whole story, you can miss potentially relevant data from mobile devices and corporate chat apps like Microsoft Teams or Slack. The ability to collect and review this type of data allows you to better understand the facts surrounding your litigation so you’re able to …
read moreDiscovery requests of the past had little reason to include text messages as a form of evidence. As texts became the preferred method for informal communications, their usage in the business world also grew. Today, some industry experts refer to texts as the new email, citing them as the main source of relevant information. This shift presents new challenges for litigants.
read moreSince there are multiple types of ESI, it’s hard to definitively say that one format type is superior. Arguably, any form is acceptable so long as it facilitates “orderly, efficient, and cost-effective discovery.” Requesting parties may ask for ESI to be produced in native, PDF, TIFF, or paper files. Determinations typically consider the production software’s capabilities as well as the resources accessible to the responding party.
read moreSpoliation refers to the failure to preserve relevant information during contemplated or pending litigation. According to the FRCP, intentional spoliation may result in dismissal of action, default judgment, or court/jury presumption that the missing information was unfavorable to the responsible party. If unintentional, the court may impose measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice.
read moreLearn what’s driving the rising cost of legal data collection and review and how to address your cost recovery model for greater efficiency and profitability .
read moreThough a more basic searching technique, keyword searches allow professionals to identify one or two specific words from multiple documents. Nowadays, keyword searches are considered inferior to the successor, predictive [...]
read more|
On-Premise Processing and Review offer unique advantages that the cloud alone can’t replicate. Make an informed decision. |
