Our Insights on eDiscovery

Last week, we talked about the components of a preferred vendor program. Establishing a program is a “project”, and should be approached with a solid plan of action. First, identify who will put the program together. The team should be made up of experienced litigation support professionals and it should incorporate input from litigation team members. Once the team is in place, you need a step-by-step approach for moving forward.

Yesterday, we talked about a couple of different ways in which law firms work with litigation support and eDiscovery vendors. And, we talked about the advantages to a centralized approach and establishing a preferred vendor program. What, exactly, is a preferred vendor program? To most people, it’s having a list of pre-approved vendors that that can be called on as the need arises. That is certainly the core of a preferred vendor program. But, a good program goes a bit further.

Law firms take different approaches to working with vendors. In some firms, individual litigation teams evaluate, select and manage vendors on a case-by-case basis. Other firms take a centralized approach where all vendor activities are coordinated and managed by a centralized litigation support department. And taking that a step further, many firms that use a centralized approach, establish a preferred vendor program. What works best? That probably depends on the culture and organization of a law firm.

It starts when you are evaluating and selecting a vendor. Based on your review of a vendor’s qualifications, procedures and technology, along with feedback you’ve received from references, make sure you select a vendor that is likely to do high quality work and that has a good track record. Once a project is underway, look at the vendor’s work to ensure it meets your expectations. This is especially important with work that is labor-intensive. In fact, there are three levels of quality control that you should be doing.