Our Insights on eDiscovery

Read on to learn more about the latest trends and insights in the world of digital discovery.

Working Successfully with eDiscovery and Litigation Support Service Providers: Preventing Quality Problems

It starts when you are evaluating and selecting a vendor. Based on your review of a vendor’s qualifications, procedures and technology, along with feedback you’ve received from references, make sure you select a vendor that is likely to do high quality work and that has a good track record. Once a project is underway, look at the vendor’s work to ensure it meets your expectations. This is especially important with work that is labor-intensive. In fact, there are three levels of quality control that you should be doing.

read more

Working Successfully with eDiscovery and Litigation Support Service Providers: Preventing Unexpected Schedule Problems

Of all the problems you might have to report to an attorney, the worst may be that you are going to miss a production deadline. Deadlines get missed because document or data collections are larger than expected, the task is more difficult than expected, sufficient technical resources aren’t allocated to the project, or the project simply isn’t staffed properly. Good communication up front with a vendor, and good monitoring throughout a project can minimize the chance of missing deadlines.

read more

eDiscovery Case Law: Written Litigation Hold Notice Not Required

The Pension Committee case was one of the most important cases of 2010 (or any year, for that matter). So, perhaps it’s not surprising that it is starting to become frequently cited by those looking for sanction for failure to issue a written litigation hold. In Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Country Gourmet Foods, LLC, a U.S. District Court in the Western District of New York declined to follow the Pension Committee decision in the Southern District of New York to the extent that the Pension Committee decision held “that implementation of a written litigation hold notice is required in order to avoid an inference that relevant evidence has been presumptively destroyed by the party failing to implement such written litigation hold.”

read more

eDiscovery Best Practices: What Are the Skeletons in Your ESI Closet?

Law firms and corporations alike tend to keep data storage devices well beyond what their compliance requirements or business needs actually dictate. These so-called “skeletons in the closet” pose a major problem when the entity gets sued or subpoenaed. All that dusty data is suddenly potentially discoverable. Legal counsel can be proactive and initiate responsible handling of this legacy data by defining a new, defensible information governance process.

read more

eDiscovery Case Law: Facebook Did Not Deduce That They Must Produce

In this case, United States Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd of the Northern District of California compelled Facebook to produce ESI that was previously produced in a converted, non-searchable format and further ordered Facebook not to use a third-party vendor’s online production software to merely “provide access” to it. The court’s order granting the plaintiff’s Motion To Compel Production in In re Facebook PPC Advertising Litigation, 2011 WL 1324516 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 6, 2011) addressed the importance of ESI Protocols, the requirement to produce ESI in native formats, and production of documents versus providing access to them.

read more

Working Successfully with eDiscovery and Litigation Support Service Providers: Preventing Unexpected Costs

Unfortunately, it’s just not possible to know up-front precisely what a litigation support or eDiscovery project will cost. There are too many unknowns, and, therefore, too many opportunities for surprises regarding costs. You can, however, avoid some of those surprises with good upfront communication with the vendor. Here are some steps you can take to prevent surprises and control costs.

read more

Working Successfully with eDiscovery and Litigation Support Service Providers: Monitoring Work and Preventing Problems

So many law firm litigation support folks that I know have an unpleasant war story or two about a project they did with a vendor. I usually find these frustrating, because more often than not, the problems could have been avoided. Taking a few preventative steps early on, and doing a good job of monitoring project activity can make all the difference. In the next few posts in this series, we’re going to look at ways to make the projects you do with vendors run smoother.

read more

eDiscovery Best Practices: Checking for Malware is the First Step to eDiscovery Processing

A little over a month ago, I noted that we hadn’t missed a (business) day yet in publishing a post for the blog. That streak almost came to an end last week. As I often do in the early mornings before getting ready for work, I spent some time searching for articles to read and identifying potential blog topics and found a link on a site related to “New Federal Rules”. Curious, I clicked on it and…up popped a pop-up window from our virus checking software (AVG Anti-Virus, or so I thought) that the site had found a file containing a “trojan horse” program. The odd thing about the pop-up window is that there was no “Fix” button to fix the trojan horse. So, I chose the best available option to move it to the vault. Then, all hell broke loose.

read more