Our Insights on eDiscovery

eDiscovery Best Practices: Database Discovery Pop Quiz

January 7, 2011

Databases: You can’t live with them, you can’t live without them. Or so it seems in eDiscovery. On a regular basis, I’ve seen various articles and discussions related to discovery of databases and other structured data and I remain very surprised how few legal teams understand database discovery and know how to handle it. But, maybe you already know all you need to know about databases? Here is a brief “pop” quiz on database concepts. See how many you can answer!

Managing an eDiscovery Contract Review Team: Clearly Define Objectives

January 6, 2011

Yesterday, we introduced the blog series to discuss Managing an eDiscovery Contract Review Team. Now, it’s time to get started! The first step in preparing for a document review is to very clearly define the objectives of the review. It’s an easy step, but it’s very important. It will drive several subsequent decisions that you’ll make regarding management of the project.

Managing an eDiscovery Contract Review Team: Introduction

January 5, 2011

In a perfect world, attorneys responsible for a case would review an entire document collection for responsive materials. On large cases with huge collections, that’s just not practical or possible. In those situations, your only choice may be to pull together a team of contract reviewers to identify responsive materials.

eDiscovery Trends: 2011 Predictions — By The Numbers

January 4, 2011

Comedian Nick Bakay always ends his Tale of the Tape skits where he compares everything from Married vs. Single to Divas vs. Hot Dogs with the phrase “It’s all so simple when you break things down scientifically”. The late December/early January time frame is always when various people in eDiscovery make their annual predictions as to what trends to expect in the coming year. I thought we would take a look at other predictions and see if we can spot some common trends among those. Here they are.

State eDiscovery Rules: Wisconsin Adopts Amendments to Rules for eDiscovery

January 3, 2011

On November 1 of last year, we noted on this blog that Oklahoma had become the latest state to adopt amendments to their Rules of Civil Procedure, leaving only 14 states (including DC) to not have enacted any rules changes that address discovery of ESI as of January 1st of this year. That’s because on January 1, Wisconsin became the latest state to adopt eDiscovery amendments to their Rules of Civil Procedure.

eDiscovery Case Law: Crispin v. Christian Audigier Inc.

December 30, 2010

Discoverability of social media content has been a big topic this year, with several cases addressing the issue. The holiday week look back at cases concludes with Crispin v. Christian Audigier Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 52832 (C.D. Calif. May 26, 2010), which addresses whether ‘private’ data on social networks is discoverable.

eDiscovery Case Law: Major Tours v. Colorel

December 29, 2010

The holiday week look back at cases continues with Major Tours, Inc. v. Colorel, 2010 WL 2557250 (D.N.J. June 22, 2010), which addresses whether a party may obtain a Protective Order relieving it of the duty to access backup tapes, even when that party’s failure to issue a litigation hold resulted in the data only being available on those backup tapes.

eDiscovery Case Law: Rajala v. McGuire Woods

December 28, 2010

The holiday week look back at cases continues with Rajala v. McGuire Woods LLP, (D. Kan. July 22, 2010), which addresses the applicability of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e) in McGuire Woods’ request for a clawback provision for privileged documents.

eDiscovery Case Law: Pension Committee

December 27, 2010

This holiday week, we’re taking a look back at some of the cases which have had the most significance (from an eDiscovery standpoint) of the year. The first case we will look at is The Pension Committee of the Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, 29010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 4546 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2010) (as amended May 28, 2010), commonly referred to as “Pension Committee”.

eDiscovery Trends: Myth of SaaS Insecurity Finally Busted

December 23, 2010

Eleven years ago, when I first began talking to attorneys about hosting document collections online to manage the review and production process for discovery, the typical response that I got was “I would never consider putting my client’s documents online – it’s just not secure”. These days, few folks seem to have that concern any more when it comes to putting sensitive data and documents online.